| Oct 27, 2022 | Case: 22-CT-005153 | Judge Farr |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for making an illegal right turn on red. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, a drunk-like appearance, and very slurred speech. They also noticed the defendant to appear slow and sluggish. According to the officer, he performed poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. | |
| Defense: | The officer over exaggerated the level of impairment in his police reports as compared to the actual video tape. After discussions with the State about the evidence, they Dropped the DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
Parks & Braxton, PA: Miami DUI Lawyer | Criminal Defense
CRIMINAL CASE RESULTS
OUR RECENT CRIMINAL DEFENSE VICTORIES
| Oct 27, 2022 | Case: 22-CT-008531 | Judge Farr |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for speeding and running a red light. Officers observed an odor alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. The defendant admitted to consuming one beer. After performing various field sobriety tests, he was arrested for DUI. He then blew a .150 and .146 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | Due to various discrepancies between the police reports and the videotape, the State Dropped the DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Oct 26, 2022 | Case: 22-CT-002401 | Judge Dekleva |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for swerving and almost causing a collision. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and confusion while speaking. She stated she was drunk and knew she should not be driving. She performed very poorly on field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later blew a .167 and .164 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | After speaking to the prosecutor about the evidence and about the defendant herself, the State Dropped the DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Oct 26, 2022 | Case: 22-CT-002072 | Judge Dekleva |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for crossing over the double yellow lane marker into opposing traffic. The officers noticed an odor of alcohol, a flushed face, and bloodshot eyes. He admitted to having drank 4 beers. After performing various roadside tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .128 and .121 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | Due to conflicts between the written reports and the videotape, the State Dropped the DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Oct 26, 2022 | Case: 22-CT-000652 | Judge Roberts |
| Facts: | The defendant was involved in a traffic crash. When officers arrived, they noticed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and slurred speech. According to the officer, the defendant stumbled and lost his balance. He was asked to perform roadside tests to which he complied. He then performed the walk and turn, one leg stand, an HGN (eye test). He was subsequently arrested for DUI and later refused the breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI. | |
| Defense: | The defendant was the victim in the crash and not the at fault driver. A car pulled out and smashed into him. Also, on the tape, his speech was not slurred. In addition, although the officer wrote the defendant stumbled, that was not on tape and we could see the defendant standing around for about 10-15 minutes without appearing off balance. | |
| Result: | The State Dropped the Defendant's Second DUI. | |
| Oct 26, 2022 | Case: 22-CT-009975 | Judge Conrad |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and heavily slurred speech. The defendant also had trouble locating his wallet and other items. After performing poorly on roadside tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .177 and .171 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | After several discussions with the State regarding the evidence, the State Dropped the DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Oct 25, 2022 | Case: 21-CT-046294 | Judge Silverman |
| Facts: | The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash. Officers noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, a flushed face, and watery/glassy eyes. His speech was slurred and thick tongued and he appeared confused. He was asked to perform roadside tests but he refused. A vodka bottle was found in the defendant's vehicle. He was then arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI. | |
| Defense: | If a defendant refuses to perform roadside tests, the officer must advise the defendant of the adverse consequences for refusing. If they do not, the refusal will be excluded from evidence. Here, the officer never advised the defendant of any adverse consequences. In addition, on tape, the defendant's speech appeared normal and he did not appear confused. | |
| Result: | The State Dropped the Defendant's Second DUI. | |
| Oct 24, 2022 | Case: 22-CT-006546 | Judge Bristow |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for weaving and driving on a flat tire. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and glossy eyes. He was unable to form a complete sentence and was crying. His motions were slow, he had difficulty following instructions, and admitted to having drank 3-4 Modelo beers. After performing very poorly on roadside tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .209 and .206 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | After several discussions with the State about various conflicts in the evidence, the State Dropped the DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Oct 18, 2022 | Case: 22-CT-500635 | Judge Swett |
| Facts: | The defendant backed his car into another car in a bar parking lot. When officers arrived, they noticed he had an odor of alcohol, he stumbled, and also had to catch his balance. He had a flushed face, slurred speech, and was unable to form coherent sentences. He refused to perform field sobriety tests and was then arrested for DUI. A bar receipt was located which showed the defendant had purchased fireball shots. The defendant was then arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's Third DUI. | |
| Defense: | Under Florida law, an officer must advise a defendant of any adverse consequences when a defendant refuses to perform roadside tests. Thus, the refusal to perform roadside tests would have been excluded from evidence. In addition, the firm had questioned the officer at the initial administrative DMV hearing. The firm ordered that testimony and many of the things that the officer testified to were contradicted by his police reports. Thus, his credibility was called into question. | |
| Result: | The State Dropped the defendant's Third DUI. | |
| Oct 17, 2022 | Case: 22-CT-006812 | Judge Conrad |
| Facts: | The defendant was found passed out and slumped over the wheel in his running vehicle in a bar parking lot. When officers awoke the defendant, they noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, unsteady appearance, and bloodshot eyes. He admitted to having too much to drink and had vomited about 30 minutes ago. He then refused to perform roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. | |
| Defense: | The defendant had walked out of the bar he had been drinking at and did the right thing by not driving and trying to sleep it off. Also, while sleeping, he had no capability to operate the car. Thus, he couldn't have been in actual physical control. On tape, he kept telling the police he was trying he do the right thing by not driving. After several discussions with the prosecutor, they Dismissed the DUI. | |
| Result: | The DUI was dismissed. | |
| Oct 12, 2022 | Case: 22-CT-030800 | Judge Silverman |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for almost causing an accident in a parking lot and then weaving. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred/incoherent speech. He appeared clumsy, stumbled, and swayed. He admitted to having consumed 3 drinks. He then performed various field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .164 and .159 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | After several conversations with the prosecutor about conflicts in the written evidence versus the video, as well as the defendant's personal history, the State Dropped the DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Oct 11, 2022 | Case: AEBMQEE | Judge Lawhorne |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for driving with no headlights. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and he admitted to having drank wine. According to officer, he performed poorly on the roadside tests and was then arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test. | |
| Defense: | The video tape contradicted the officer's reports. The defendant performed much better on the roadside tests on tape than as written. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Oct 11, 2022 | Case: AEBMSXE | Judge Lawhorne |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped after he hit a curb and drove up on a curbed median. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, watery/gassy eyes, and a sway to his stance. The defendant's speech was slurred/mumbled and he also admitted to taking prescribed medicine. Due to safety reasons because of the defendant's impairment level, all the roadside tests were not performed. He was then arrested for DUI and later blew a .123 and .116 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | After several discussions with the prosecutor about the defendant's personal history and the evidence, the State Dropped the DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Oct 4, 2022 | Case: 22-CT-001595 | Judge Oster |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for weaving. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. The defendant also admitted to having consumed alcohol earlier in the day. He then performed various field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test. | |
| Defense: | There was a lack of probable cause to arrest the defendant based on his performance on the field sobriety tests. The firm pointed this out to the State. They agreed and Dropped the DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Oct 4, 2022 | Case: 22-CT-027353 | Judge Babb |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for swerving all over the road. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, mumbling speech, and she was clumsy. She had trouble standing and almost fell getting out of the car. She also admitted to having drank White Claws. She performed poorly on roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. She later blew a .232 and .225 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | After several negotiations with the State about the defendant and the evidence, they Dropped the DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Oct 3, 2022 | Case: 22-CT-000796 | Judge Wansboro |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for traveling southbound in the north bound lane. Officers noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. The defendant had a hard time getting out of his car and used the car for balance. The defendant admitted to having drank wine. He then performed various field sobriety tests such as the walk and turn, one leg stand, and HGN (eye test). He was then arrested for DUI and later refused the breath test. | |
| Defense: | The defendant's video tape contradicted the officer's written observations and conclusions and his reports. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Sep 22, 2022 | Case: 22-MM-02314 | Judge Mkyton |
| Facts: | The defendant's boat was stopped for a safety inspection. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol and requested that the defendant perform roadside tests. At first he refused, then he agreed to perform various field sobriety tests used in boating under the influence case such as the finger to nose, palm pat, and hand coordination. He was then arrested for Boating Under the Influence and later refused the breath test. | |
| Defense: | Based on an odor of alcohol alone, there was no reasonable suspicion of a crime to believe that the defendant was operating his vessel while impaired to lawfully even request field sobriety tests. | |
| Result: | The State Dropped the BUI. | |
| Sep 22, 2022 | Case: AEX8ZDE | Judge Szematowicz |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for driving over 100 mph. The officer noticed bloodshot/watery eyes and eye lid tremors. He also had body tremors, a strong odor of burnt marijuana coming from this breath, and slurred speech. He was then asked to perform various roadside tests such as the HGN (eye test), one leg stand, walk and turn, and finger to nose. He also had the defendant estimate the passage of 30 seconds in his head otherwise known as the Rhomberg balance. He was then arrested for DUI and later refused a urine test. | |
| Defense: | The defendant had Delta 8 marijuana in his car which is legal. He stated that is all he uses. It was unknown whether he was impaired by the legal Delta 8 or the illegal Delta 9 marijuana. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Sep 20, 2022 | Case: 21-012854MU10A | Judge Solomon |
| Facts: | The defendant was involved in a crash whereby he hit a car and ended up colliding with a utility pole. Several officers arrived to conduct an accident investigation. At the same time, a deputy arrived to conduct a criminal investigation. On video, the deputy asked the defendant a series of questions. In response to questioning, the defendant acknowledged that he was the driver. The defendant performed extremely poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He was taken to the police station and blew a .219 and a .213 in the Intoxilyzer. This was the defendant's second DUI. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton filed a motion to suppress based on an unlawful arrest. First, the firm filed a motion to exclude the defendant's statements because the deputy failed to read him his Maranda warnings. Next, counsel argued that pursuant to 316.645, the arresting deputy, who never spoke with the other civilians in the crash, had no probable cause to arrest the defendant. The motion was granted. All evidence was excluded. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Sep 20, 2022 | Case: 22-CT-003226 | Judge Conrad |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, and he displayed cognitive deficiencies. For example, he could not find his cell phone even though it was on his lap, and also was forgetful while speaking to the officer. The defendant appeared unsteady and swayed while he stood. He then performed poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI. | |
| Defense: | Many of the observations that the officer described in his reports were contradicted by the video tape. The State agreed and Dropped the defendant's Second DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
OBTAIN IMMEDIATE LEGAL HELP
To save your license, you must act within 10 days. Contact a partner about your case at (954) 519-2290 or fill out the form here.