| Jul 29, 2014 | Case: 2014-CT-020719AXXXXX | Judge Friedland |
| Facts: | The defendant was found by police slumped over the wheel of his car on the shoulder of the road. The defendant's truck was running. EMS was called and the defendant refused any treatment. Officers noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, red eyes, and a flushed face. Officers observed the defendant to be unsteady and he stumbled upon exiting the car. The defendant allegedly refused to perform the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he allegedly refused the breath test. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the officers on scene had a working video camera. The defendant was initially on video, however, when it came time to begin a DUI investigation, they took the defendant off camera so he could not be seen or heard refusing any field sobriety or breath tests, nor anything else for that matter. Also, when the defendant was seen on video tape, he was not off balance and his speech appeared fine. Thus, the video tape contradicted the written police reports. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
Parks & Braxton, PA: Miami DUI Lawyer | Criminal Defense
CRIMINAL CASE RESULTS
OUR RECENT CRIMINAL DEFENSE VICTORIES
| Jul 29, 2014 | Case: CT-8604-XEP | Judge Conrad |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for speeding and continuously weaving. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and glassy eyes. According to the officer, he failed the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test. The entire incident, including the alleged driving pattern, was captured on video tape. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the police reports contradicted the video tape. For example, the defendant had no slurred speech and was not continuously weaving on video as the officer stated.. Also the defendant never stepped off the line on the walk and turn test even though the officer told him on tape that he did. Furthermore, the officer even asked the defendant for a breath test as soon as the defendant exited his vehicle, before he was even told what was going on or had been arrested. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Jul 28, 2014 | Case: 2014-CT-003983-O | Judge Bell |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for driving at a high rate of speed and cutting off another car. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, droopy eye lids, and slurred speech. According to the officer, he failed the video taped roadside tests which consisted of the HGN (eye test) , walk and turn, and one leg stand tests. The defendant was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .113 and .102 in the breath machine. This was the defendant's Second DUI arrest. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton had pretrial negotiations with the State the week before the trial date. The Judge had already excluded from evidence any evidence of the defendant's breath test results. We pointed out to the prosecutor that the video contradicted the written reports regarding the defendant's performance on the field sobriety tests. The defendant even walked backwards instead of forward on the walk and turn on the back nine steps and kept his balance. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Jul 10, 2014 | Case: 7199-XEM | Judge Wolfson |
| Facts: | The defendant was found by the police passed out in his car, with the engine running, and his foot on the brake. Once the officers awoke the defendant, they observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and watery eyes. The defendant was unable to perform any roadside tests due to safety concerns as he had major problems even standing on his own. The defendant admitted to drinking five Coronas. After his arrest, he blew a .156 and .141 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton had several pretrial discussion with the prosecutor. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Jul 10, 2014 | Case: 3874-XEX | Judge Wolfson |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for weaving. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and blood-shot eyes. The defendant admitted to drinking three glasses of wine. According to the officer, he failed the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton negotiated with the State to get the DUI dropped prior to a trial date. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Jul 2, 2014 | Case: 1093-XEV | Judge Ortiz |
| Facts: | The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear-end crash while he was driving at a high rate of speed. When officers arrived, the defendant had an odor of alcohol on his breath, slurred speech, and watery eyes. The defendant performed poorly on the roadside tests. For example, on the walk and turn test, he stepped off the line numerous times, took an incorrect number of steps, and failed to touch heel to toe. On the estimation of time test, the defendant was asked to estimate 30 seconds in his own mind. He estimated 8 seconds for 30 seconds. On the finger to nose, he missed the tip of nose every time and kept his eyes open. On the one leg stand, he put his foot down four times, hopped, and used his arms for balance. He was then arrested for DUI and subsequently refused the breath test. | |
| Defense: | After over a year of negotiating with State, Parks & Braxton was able to negotiate with the prosecutor to drop the DUI before trial. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Jun 30, 2014 | Case: 2014-CT-008260AXXX | Judge Weiss |
| Facts: | The defendant was found passed out in her car by police at a red light. Officers observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, blood-shot eyes, and balance issues. She refused to do any roadside tests on video tape and was arrested for DUI. After her arrest, she blew a .191 and .179 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton had pre-trial discussions with the State to get the DUI dropped prior to a trial. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Jun 30, 2014 | Case: CT-7208-XEP | Judge Greco |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for spinning his tires and making a wide turn into the oncoming traffic lane. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and he admitted to having some drinks. According to the officer, he failed the video taped field sobriety exercises which consisted of the walk and turn, one leg stand, finger to nose, and count the numbers backward tests. He was then arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a a .144 and .132 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton conducted negotiations with the State prosecutor prior to trial. We pointed out out that the defendant's performance on the video taped roadside tests contradicted his alleged breath alcohol level. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Jun 30, 2014 | Case: 2014-CT-005888AXXX | Judge Weiss |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for driving with no head lights. The defendant had an odor of alcohol on her breath, glassy eyes, a flushed face, and admitted to consuming two glasses of wine. According to the officer, she did not perform up to standards on the video taped roadside tests. For example, on the one leg stand she put her foot down a few times and and used her arms for balance. On the walk and turn test, she stumbled on the turn, did not touch heel to toe, and used her arms for balance. She was then arrested for DUI. After her arrest, she blew a .086 and .083 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton spoke with the prosecutor ahead of any trial dates in order to attempt to negotiate them dropping the DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Jun 26, 2014 | Case: 2013-CM-020146 | Judge Jeske |
| Facts: | The defendant was found passed out in the driver's seat of his car at a red light with the engine running. Several other cars were honking their horns. When the police arrived, they got the defendant out of the car on video tape and placed him in hand cuffs. Once he was eventually uncuffed, the police observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol on this breath, red eyes, and slow movements. He also had trouble keeping his balance. He was then moved to a different location to perform field sobriety tests to which he refused. He was then arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test. During a search of the defendant's vehicle after the arrest, the police found some marijuana and paraphernalia. | |
| Defense: | Prior to a trial, Parks & Braxton had discussions with the State about the video tape and all the various police reports written by the different officers on the scene. We pointed out that not only was each police report contradictory in nature about the facts, but the video was also contradicted by what had been written. The State Dropped the DUI and the defendant also received No convictions on his record for any drug charges. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Jun 16, 2014 | Case: 2014-CT-009036AXXX | Judge Weiss |
| Facts: | The defendant was found passed out in the driver's seat in his car at an intersection. Officers, upon awaking the defendant, noticed an odor of alcohol and red eyes. The defendant stated he had been drinking earlier at a golf event. He failed the roadside tests which were video taped and then was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .114 and .109 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton had discussions with the State prior to trial to get the DUI dropped. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Jun 12, 2014 | Case: 14-CT-500140 | Judge Gagliardi |
| Facts: | An anonymous caller called 911 stating that the defendant was driving all over the road and almost hitting cars. The officer spotted he defendant's car and noticed her take a wide / slow turn and over correct to get back on the road. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and a flushed face. The defendant also had blood-shot eyes and appeared sleepy. The defendant admitted to having four glasses of wine. According to the officer, she failed the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. After her arrest, she blew a .180 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton had pretrial negotiations with the State prior to trial. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| May 30, 2014 | Case: 2014-CT-015857AXXX | Judge Hanser |
| Facts: | The defendant crashed his car into a giant palm tree. He took a turn too fast which resulted in the the defendant losing control of the car. When the officer arrived, he noticed the defendant bleeding from his head, complaining of leg pain, and fire rescue had to extract him from the car. The officer observed slurred speech and the defendant could not complete a coherent sentence. The defendant was transported to the hospital. The officer, believing that the defendant may be impaired by alcohol and/or a chemical or controlled substance, ordered a blood draw from the defendant while the he had a breathing tube in his mouth and was sedated. The blood was sent to the toxicology lab and resulted in a blood alcohol level of .129 and .129. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton filed a pretrial motion to suppress the blood results. In our motion, we alleged that the officer did not have the requisite probable cause to order a blood draw. We argued in our motion that the officer did not have any "reasonable cause" to believe that the defendant was under the influence of alcohol, and/or a chemical or controlled substance as required by Florida law. Prior to the motion ever being argued, the State Dropped the DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| May 19, 2014 | Case: 13-006127MM10A | Judge Lerner-Wren |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped by the police after weaving several times and causing a taxi to brake in order to avoid a collision. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, blood-shot eyes, and a flushed face. Once outside the car, the defendant was swaying. The defendant stated he was coming from the Blue Martini and could not remember how much he had to drink. According to the officer, he failed the roadside tests. For example, on the walk and turn test, the defendant took an incorrect number of steps, did not touch heel to toe, and was confused prior to turning back down the line. On the finger to nose, he missed the tip of his nose with his finger and did not keep his head back as instructed. He was then arrested for DUI. After the defendant was arrested, he refused the breath test. However, the defendant was later taken to the hospital and submitted to a blood test. The blood tested positive at a .18 blood alcohol level. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton filed a pre-trial motion to suppress. In our motion, the firm alleged that there was a lack of probable cause to make the arrest. Prior to the motion, the State dropped the DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| May 15, 2014 | Case: 12-004534MM10A | Judge Diaz |
| Facts: | The defendant was involved in a traffic crash. The defendant was identified as the driver by an independent witness who wrote a separate affidavit. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot watery eyes as well as slurred speech. The officer stated the defendant was tripping over his feet. The defendant performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, one leg stand as well as the finger to nose test. After allegedly performing poorly on the sobriety tests the defendant was arrested for DUI. | |
| Defense: | Parks and Braxton filed a motion to suppress the arrest based on a violation of 316.645. Specifically, when an individual is involved in a crash that results in a DUI investigation, there is a protocol that must be followed prior to making a lawful arrest. Based on the violation, the defense filed the motion to suppress. The State conceded the motion and dropped the DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| May 13, 2014 | Case: 7151-XEM | Judge Altfield |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for driving to closely behind another car at a high rate of speed. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol and watery/blood-shot eyes. A DUI enforcement officer was called to the scene and made similar observations as to that of the officer who made the traffic stop. According to the officer, he exhibited several signs of intoxication on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, the defendant blew a .206 and .209 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton conducted pre-trial negotiations with the State to have the DUI Dropped. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| May 9, 2014 | Case: 12-020074MM10A | Judge Gottlieb |
| Facts: | The defendant was the at fault driver in a crash. He was speeding down the road, almost hitting curbs, and finally hit the center median and blew out his tires. When the police arrived, they noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol , blood-shot eyes, and a flushed face. The defendant stated to the police that "he was very drunk", "should not have been driving", "he drank too much", and also stated he “consumed three vodka tonics." The defendant was very unsteady and stumbling around prior to being asked to perform the field sobriety tests. The defendant refused to perform the tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton took sworn pre-trial depositions of all the witnesses. The firm then filed a motion to suppress all of the defendant's statements to the police as listed above. In our motion, we alleged they were obtained by the police in violation of Florida's accident privilege. The Judge granted the motion and excluded all of the defendant's statements. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| May 9, 2014 | Case: 2013-CT-073003AXXX-XX | Judge Clarke |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for driving over a grass median. The officer noticed the defendant to have a strong odor of alcohol on his breath, watery eyes, and thick tongued speech. The defendant stated he had drank a "few" drinks. According to the officer, he failed the roadside tests which were not video taped. He was then arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he tested positive for alcohol on the breath machine. However, the officer concluded the defendant was impaired by a chemical and/or controlled substance. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that they could not prove by which "specific" chemical and/or controlled substance allegedly impaired the defendant as required by Florida law. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| May 5, 2014 | Case: 5719-XEQ | Judge Seraphin |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for weaving. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant was unable to keep his balance once outside the car. According to the officer, he failed the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .288 in the breath machine and then failed to provide a second sample of his breath. The police then alleged he refused the breath test because he did not provide two valid samples of his breath. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton had pre-trial discussions with the prosecutor prior to trial. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| May 2, 2014 | Case: 13-CT-505628 | Judge Swett |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for weaving based on a 911 call. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slightly slurred speech, and a flushed face. According to the officer, she failed the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. After her arrest, she refused the breath test. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton had pre-trial discussions with the State to get the DUI Dropped. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
OBTAIN IMMEDIATE LEGAL HELP
To save your license, you must act within 10 days. Contact a partner about your case at (954) 519-2290 or fill out the form here.