Jul 6, 2023	Case: 21-005878MU10A	Judge Gottlieb
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for failure to maintain a single lane. Specifically, the deputy claimed that she drove into the bike lane on three occasions. The deputy observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes as well as slurred and mumbled speech. The defendant admitted to consuming two drinks. She performed field sobriety tests on video, and was subsequently arrested for DUI. She then refused to provide a breath test.
Defense:	Parks and Braxton completed a deposition of the arresting deputy. Ultimately, the video was completely inconsistent with the deputy's conclusions. Specifically, his description of the walk and turn test as well as the one leg stand test in no way matched his body worn camera. It was clear that she refused to submit to the breath test because she no longer trusted the deputy after he placed her under arrest for DUI. The DUI was dropped. She has no conviction for any offense on her record.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jul 6, 2023	Case: 21-005878MU10A	Judge Gottlieb
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for failure to maintain a single lane. Specifically, the deputy claimed that she drove into the bike lane on three occasions. The deputy observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes as well as slurred and mumbled speech. The defendant admitted to consuming two drinks. She performed field sobriety tests on video, and was subsequently arrested for DUI. She then refused to provide a breath test.
Defense:	Parks and Braxton completed a deposition of the arresting deputy. Ultimately, the video was completely inconsistent with the deputy's conclusions. Specifically, his description of the walk and turn test as well as the one leg stand test in no way matched his body worn camera. It was clear that she refused to submit to the breath test because she no longer trusted the deputy after he placed her under arrest for DUI. The DUI was dropped. She has no conviction for any offense on her record.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jul 5, 2023	Case: 20-008348MU10A	Judge Francois
Facts:	The defendant was observed running a stop sign while driving at a high rate of speed. During the driving pattern he almost collided with the officer, and continued for approximately a half a mile before pulling over. The officer immediately noticed slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, and a strong odor of alcohol. He was asked to provide his driver's license. Instead, he handed the officer a credit card. The defendant stated he had two bourbons and apologized for almost hitting him. The defendant refused to perform any sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. An inventory search of the car revealed a cooler with beer, as well as a bottle of Patron. The defendant refused a breath test.
Defense:	Despite the language in the police reports, the video was inconsistent with the report’s conclusions. Counsel spoke with the prosecutor in charge of the case who then agreed to drop the DUI. The defendant walked away with no criminal conviction on his record.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jul 5, 2023	Case: 22-010523MU10A	Judge Lerner-Wren
Facts:	The defendant was involved in a single car accident. On video, he advised that this was the first time he drove an electric vehicle and the car accelerated by itself and hit the curb. The crash investigator stated that the defendant used her patrol car to keep himself upright. On video, he appeared a bit slow and sluggish. The officers all observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes as well as slurred speech. In plain view, the car had empty wine glasses in the center console as well as a shot glass on the floor. The defendant refused to perform any field sobriety tests including the breath test. He was arrested for DUI.
Defense:	Parks and Braxton filed several motions to exclude evidence based on a series of violations of our client's rights. For example, the officer asked for a breath test prior to placing the defendant under arrest which is unlawful. In addition, the defendant made efforts to coerce the defendant to perform field sobriety tests by telling him his license would be suspended if he refused. Again, this is a misstatement of law. Finally, Parks & Braxton filed a motion to suppress based on a lack of probable cause. On the day of the hearing the prosecutor conceded the motions and dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jul 5, 2023	Case: 22-010523MU10A	Judge Lerner-Wren
Facts:	The defendant was involved in a single car accident. On video, he advised that this was the first time he drove an electric vehicle and the car accelerated by itself and hit the curb. The crash investigator stated that the defendant used her patrol car to keep himself upright. On video, he appeared a bit slow and sluggish. The officers all observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes as well as slurred speech. In plain view, the car had empty wine glasses in the center console as well as a shot glass on the floor. The defendant refused to perform any field sobriety tests including the breath test. He was arrested for DUI.
Defense:	Parks and Braxton filed several motions to exclude evidence based on a series of violations of our client's rights. For example, the officer asked for a breath test prior to placing the defendant under arrest which is unlawful. In addition, the defendant made efforts to coerce the defendant to perform field sobriety tests by telling him his license would be suspended if he refused. Again, this is a misstatement of law. Finally, Parks & Braxton filed a motion to suppress based on a lack of probable cause. On the day of the hearing the prosecutor conceded the motions and dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jul 5, 2023	Case: 20-008348MU10A	Judge Francois
Facts:	The defendant was observed running a stop sign while driving at a high rate of speed. During the driving pattern he almost collided with the officer, and continued for approximately a half a mile before pulling over. The officer immediately noticed slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, and a strong odor of alcohol. He was asked to provide his driver's license. Instead, he handed the officer a credit card. The defendant stated he had two bourbons and apologized for almost hitting him. The defendant refused to perform any sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. An inventory search of the car revealed a cooler with beer, as well as a bottle of Patron. The defendant refused a breath test.
Defense:	Despite the language in the police reports, the video was inconsistent with the report’s conclusions. Counsel spoke with the prosecutor in charge of the case who then agreed to drop the DUI. The defendant walked away with no criminal conviction on his record.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 30, 2023	Case: 23-CT-019950	Judge Atkin
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for failure to maintain a single lane. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and clumsy dexterity. He had to lean against the vehicle for support and also had fumbled movements. He then performed various roadside tests. For example, on the walk and turn, he was very off balance, took an incorrect number of steps, and started too early. On the one leg stand, he put his foot down, swayed, and used his arms for balance. He was arrested for DUI and later blew .128 and .119 in the breath machine.
Defense:	The details of the stop were only vaguely described and had hardly any details of the alleged driving pattern. Thus, the firm called into question the lawfulness of the traffic stop. After negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 30, 2023	Case: 23-CT-019950	Judge Atkin
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for failure to maintain a single lane. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and clumsy dexterity. He had to lean against the vehicle for support and also had fumbled movements. He then performed various roadside tests. For example, on the walk and turn, he was very off balance, took an incorrect number of steps, and started too early. On the one leg stand, he put his foot down, swayed, and used his arms for balance. He was arrested for DUI and later blew .128 and .119 in the breath machine.
Defense:	The details of the stop were only vaguely described and had hardly any details of the alleged driving pattern. Thus, the firm called into question the lawfulness of the traffic stop. After negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 29, 2023	Case: 23-CT-022407	Judge Silverman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving too slowly and swerving back and forth. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, rambling speech, and he had gait ataxia. He also appeared drowsy and had glassy eyes. He then performed roadside tests such as the one leg stand, walk and turn, and HGN (eye test). He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .228 and .218 in the breath machine.
Defense:	The firm spoke to the prosecutor on numerous occasions regarding the defendant and the evidence.
Result:	They then Dropped the DUI.

Jun 29, 2023	Case: 23-CT-001989	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving with no lights after dark. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, a flushed face, trouble dividing his attention, and he swayed while he stood. He performed poorly on several roadside tests. For example, on the walk and turn, he went back up the line walking backwards. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 29, 2023	Case: 23-CT-000694	Judge Poblick
Facts:	The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash. Both vehicles had overturned as well. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, and he appeared unsteady. There was an open bottle of beer in the defendant's truck as well. He refused to perform the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused breath test.
Defense:	When a defendant refuses to perform field sobriety tests, they must be warned of the adverse consequences. If not, the refusal will be excluded from evidence. Here, the officer never advised the defendant of any consequences. After several conversations with the prosecutor, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 29, 2023	Case: 23-CT-022407	Judge Silverman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving too slowly and swerving back and forth. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, rambling speech, and he had gait ataxia. He also appeared drowsy and had glassy eyes. He then performed roadside tests such as the one leg stand, walk and turn, and HGN (eye test). He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .228 and .218 in the breath machine.
Defense:	The firm spoke to the prosecutor on numerous occasions regarding the defendant and the evidence.
Result:	They then Dropped the DUI.

Jun 29, 2023	Case: 23-CT-001989	Judge Gutman
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving with no lights after dark. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, a flushed face, trouble dividing his attention, and he swayed while he stood. He performed poorly on several roadside tests. For example, on the walk and turn, he went back up the line walking backwards. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 29, 2023	Case: 23-CT-000694	Judge Poblick
Facts:	The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash. Both vehicles had overturned as well. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, and he appeared unsteady. There was an open bottle of beer in the defendant's truck as well. He refused to perform the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused breath test.
Defense:	When a defendant refuses to perform field sobriety tests, they must be warned of the adverse consequences. If not, the refusal will be excluded from evidence. Here, the officer never advised the defendant of any consequences. After several conversations with the prosecutor, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 28, 2023	Case: 22-CT-011039	Judge Taylor
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and an unstable balance. She then performed various roadside tests such as the walk and turn, one leg stand, and HGN (eye test). She was then arrested for DUI. This was the defendant's Third DUI arrest.
Defense:	The officer over exaggerated the defendant's level of impairment in his reports. The reports were contradicted by the video. The State Dropped the DUI. It should be noted that the firm also represented her on her last DUI and it was also Dropped.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 28, 2023	Case: 22-CT-013515	Judge Taylor
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for failure to maintain a single lane and affecting the general flow of traffic. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, a red face, slurred speech, watery/glassy eyes, and he was unsteady on his feet. The defendant only performed the HGN (eye test), refused all further roadside tests and was then arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense:	When a defendant refuses to perform field sobriety tests, they must be warned of the adverse consequences. If not, the refusal will be excluded from evidence. Here, the officer never advised the defendant of any consequences. In addition, on tape, the defendant's speech was not slurred and he was not unsteady. After several conversations with the prosecutor, the State Dropped the defendant's Second DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

Jun 28, 2023	Case: 22-CT-017275	Judge Taylor
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for running a red light. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes and he admitted to having drank and smoked pot earlier. According to the officer, he failed the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense:	The defendant performed much better on the field tests on tape than was written in the reports. After reviewing the case, the State agreed and Dropped the defendant's Second DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.