| Apr 6, 2021 | Case: 20-CT-007530 | Judge Conrad |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for speeding and cutting off other cars. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and rapid hand movements. The defendant was unable to stand still and follow simple directions. He then performed poorly on roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. | |
| Defense: | The defendant performed much better on the roadside tests on tape than as described in the reports. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
Parks & Braxton, PA: Miami DUI Lawyer | Criminal Defense
DUI CASE RESULTS
OUR RECENT DUI VICTORIES
| Apr 6, 2021 | Case: 20-CT-008658 | Judge Conrad |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for speeding and almost striking a police car. The officer observed an odor of alcohol and the defendant admitted to having drank beer. He then performed various field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test. | |
| Defense: | Based on odor of alcohol alone, there was no reasonable suspicion of a crime to even request the defendant to perform field sobriety tests. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Apr 1, 2021 | Case: AE38AFE | Judge Lawhorne |
| Facts: | The police arrived to find the defendant sitting in the drivers seat in a parking space having just finished vomiting. A caller had alerted 911 to that fact. When officers arrived, they noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, bloodshot glassy eyes, and she swayed while she stood. According the officer she failed the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. | |
| Defense: | The defendant performed much better than described in the reports so the firm pointed out to the prosecutor there was a lack of probable cause to arrest the defendant. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Mar 31, 2021 | Case: 19-CT-000915 | Judge Hamilton |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for weaving. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, glassy eyes, and a flushed face. He then performed the walk and turn, one leg stand, and HGN (eye test) exercises. He was subsequently arrested for DUI and later refused the breath test. | |
| Defense: | The firm pointed out to the State that one officer got nystagmus on the HGN (eye test) and the officer did not. This was heard as they were talking on tape. As HGN is a strong indicator of alcohol being in one system, this inconsistency called their credibility into question. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Mar 31, 2021 | Case: 2020-104240-MMDL | Judge Kelly |
| Facts: | The defendant was the at fault driver in a sideswipe crash. The officers observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. Vodka was found in the defendant's car. She performed very poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused the breath test. | |
| Defense: | Due to numerous inconsistencies between the video and the reports, the State Dropped the DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Mar 30, 2021 | Case: 20-CT-002205 | Judge Conrad |
| Facts: | Officers responded to call about a reckless driver and located the defendant. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, watery/glassy eyes, and a red face. He also had eyelid tremors and was unsteady on his feet. According to the officers, he failed the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test. | |
| Defense: | and was arrested for DUI. There was no corroboration of any driving pattern observed by the officers so the lawfulness of the traffic stop was called into question. In addition, there were contradictions with the police reports themselves as well as what took place on video tape. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Mar 30, 2021 | Case: 20-CT-047339 | Judge Friedland |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for weaving all over the roadway. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and a flushed face. His dexterity was clumsy, he exited the car slow, and appeared unsteady. After performing various field sobriety tests such and the walk and turn and one leg stand, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test. | |
| Defense: | The defendant was stopped for weaving all over the roadway. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and a flushed face. His dexterity was clumsy, he exited the car slow, and appeared unsteady. After performing various field sobriety tests such and the walk and turn and one leg stand, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Mar 25, 2021 | Case: 19-012366MU10A | Judge Lerner-Wren |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for improper backing. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and he stated that he had consumed two drinks. The officer also noticed the defendant to sway. He refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI. | |
| Defense: | There were many conflicts between the video and the police reports. We pointed out that there was also a lack of probable cause to arrest the defendant. | |
| Result: | The State Dropped the Defendant's Second DUI. | |
| Mar 24, 2021 | Case: 20-CT-OOO483 | Judge Horton |
| Facts: | Citizens called 911 stating that the defendant was driving all over the road and almost striking other cars. Officers then conducted a traffic stop. They observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. He was unsteady exiting the car and also while standing. After performing poorly on the roadside tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test. | |
| Defense: | There was no video of the DUI investigation, only audio. Many observations alleged in the reports were contradicted by the audio of the investigation. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Mar 24, 2021 | Case: 20-CT-011256 | Judge Gutman |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped after she almost hit a police car. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, severely slurred speech, and she seemed disoriented. She was arrested for DUI after performing poorly on roadside tests. She later blew a .159 and a .146 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | During pretrial discovery, the defense uncovered that the arresting officer had some internal affairs issues. This called into question his credibility. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Mar 24, 2021 | Case: 19-CT-014406 | Judge Gutman |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for serving and driving too slowly on the highway. Upon being stopped, officers noticed the defendant had an odor of marijuana, bloodshot eyes, and his speech was low and slow. He then performed field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later gave a urine sample which revealed marijuana. | |
| Defense: | Based on the the defendant's video, the firm was able to show that there was a lack of probable cause to arrest the Defendant. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Mar 19, 2021 | Case: 20-007055CF10A | Judge Usan |
| Facts: | The defendant was approached by police after he was observed revving his engine multiple times in a McDonalds's parking lot. When officers first approached, they noticed a large Vodka bottle in drivers side of the car and it was half filled. They noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, red/bloodshot eyes, and he seemed confused as to his location. Once out of the car, he stumbled backwards and had to stabilize himself to keep from falling. He refused to perform roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test. He was charged with Felony DUI as this was his Fifth (5th) DUI. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton took pretrial depositions of all the officers at the scene. As each officer came in and gave sworn testimony, they all not only contradicted themselves upon our questioning, but also their police reports. The State then Dropped the defendant's Fifth (5th) DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Mar 18, 2021 | Case: ACEV6GE | Judge Hessinger |
| Facts: | The defendant was found sleeping in her car. A caller had stated that an individual was sleeping in her car on the side of the road in their neighborhood. When police awoke the defendant, they observed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and mumbled speech. She swayed, stumbled, and was unsteady. She failed the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused the breath test. This was the defendant's second DUI and third arrest for DUI. | |
| Defense: | The defendant was simply sitting in her car sleeping. She was not in actual physical control of the motor vehicle as she had no capability of operating the car. | |
| Result: | The State Dropped her Second DUI. | |
| Mar 18, 2021 | Case: 20-CT-041975 | Judge Friedland |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for driving northbound in the southbound lane. The defendant had an odor of alcohol, red eyes, and he admitted to having drank beer. He also had slurred speech and swayed while he stood. After performing poorly on roadside tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .131 and a .129 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | The defendant's video of his roadside tests clearly showed that he may be been absorbing alcohol and under the legal limit at the time of driving. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Mar 17, 2021 | Case: 19-011338MU10A | Judge Carpenter-Toye |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, a flushed face, and bloodshot eyes. The defendant then performed various field sobriety tests whereby the officer stated that he failed each exercise. He was subsequently arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test. | |
| Defense: | After obtaining the evidence, it was clear that the video was a complete contradiction to the officer's testimony. Both the one leg stand as well as the walk and turn test differed exponentially from what the officer stated. After announcing ready for trial, the prosecutor agreed to drop the DUI. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Mar 15, 2021 | Case: 20-CT-002964 | Judge Gutman |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for speeding, weaving and almost hitting a police car. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot/glassy eyes. He also admitted to having drank vodka. After performing poorly on roadside tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .161 and a .151 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | Prior to obtaining the defendant's breath results of .161 and .151, the defendant had blown in the machine at least four other times. The breath readings were showing up as volume not met (not sufficient samples) and also outside of the .02 margin of error. This was all documented on the machine printouts. The firm point this out to the the State that the machine could have been erroneously reading the defendant's breath alcohol level. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Mar 15, 2021 | Case: 20-CT-3844 | Judge Conrad |
| Facts: | The defendant was the at fault driver in a head on crash. The defendant was transported to the hospital prior to the police arriving on scene. When officers arrived at the hospital, they noticed an an odor of alcohol coming from the defendant. She was later charged with DUI. | |
| Defense: | There was no probable cause to charge the defendant with DUI baaed on odor being the only DUI observation. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Mar 12, 2021 | Case: 20-CT-013703 | Judge Panse |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for speeding and weaving. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, very slurred speech, and red/glassy eyes. He had a red face and droopy eyes. He refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a. 132 and a .120 in the breath machine. | |
| Defense: | Based on all evidence, there was a lack of probable cause to arrest the defendant. Thus, the breath test would have been suppressed. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Mar 10, 2021 | Case: 19-CT-001908 | Judge Crown |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped by police after hotel staff called 911 at the resort where they were staying. The caller stated that the defendant and his girlfriend were causing a disturbance at the pool due to alcohol intoxication and were throwing them out. The officer, prior to stopping the defendant, also observed no working taillights on the car. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he was profusely sweating. He also had glassy eyes and stated he should have been at home sleeping. After refusing to perform roadside tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test. This was the defendant's Third DUI arrest. | |
| Defense: | Parks & Braxton took a pretrial deposition of the arresting officer. At the depo, we were able to gain testimony from the officer that contradicted his reports. In addition, after the depo it was clear the officer did not advise the defendant of any adverse consequences when he refused to perform roadside tests, as required by law. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
| Mar 10, 2021 | Case: 19-CM-012583 | Judge Jeske |
| Facts: | The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, watery/bloodshot eyes, and droopy eyelids. He had dilated pupils and admitted to having consumed 2 to 3 beers. According to the officer, he failed the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test. He was also charged with resisting an officer without violence for attempting to knock the officer down. | |
| Defense: | The firm pointed out to the State that any mishaps on the roadside tests were not due to impairment by alcohol, but rather the aggressive nature of the officer. The State Dropped the DUI and the resisting charge was Dismissed. | |
| Result: | The State dropped the DUI. | |
OBTAIN IMMEDIATE LEGAL HELP
To save your license, you must act within 10 days. Contact a partner about your case at (954) 519-2290 or fill out the form here.